Which choices need action, which are underway, and did the last ones land.
✦ Ask the analyst
Available on every tab in your workspace — answers come with sources, the period, the calculation, and a confidence level.
Answers run on your connected books after signup. The sample keeps every number deterministic — it never improvises a reply.
DECISIONS AND FOLLOW-UP
What was decided, who owns it and when to review
A short working log: the decision, its owner, the due date, the expected effect and the actual outcome. No automatic scoring and no invented “percent complete”.
Why there is no “approved impact” and no “% on track”
No “approved impact” and no “% on track” here: this ledger has no approval step, and the only outcome it records is a non-causal association. Both figures would have to be invented.
-
State In work Decision Prime cost rose to 62% of sales from 60% — the spring protein contract reset higher and a labour-hours overrun on the two patio openings added ~$19K. On a hospitality margin that 2-point move is most of a slow shoulder-month's profit. Owner You Decided · review by 2026-05-20 2026-06-05 Effect when decided $19,000 – $228,000 Outcome —
Prime cost rose to 62% of sales from 60% — the spring protein contract reset higher and a labour-hours overrun on the two patio openings added ~$19K. On a hospitality margin that 2-point move is most of a slow shoulder-month's profit.
Next: nothing to do yet — the outcome is checked automatically after the review date.
Assumptions on the day· impact shown as a range — the behavioural response to this change is not yet observed, so the high edge annualises a persistent step-change
· 2 source citation(s) back the period figures
-
State Outcome recorded Decision Approved: tighten the dinner prep par levels and re-grid the weekend labor to bring prime cost back under the 62% target. Owner Marisol FOH/BOH leads Decided · review by 2026-04-19 2026-06-13 Effect when decided $65 Outcome -3 At review: 62
Assumptions on the day· Weekend covers were predictable enough to re-grid labor against.
· Tighter par levels would not raise 86'd-item incidence on peak nights.
Since this decision · InferredExpected effect (as modelled)$65At decision65At review62Movement-3No on-track score is derived from these. The expected figure is the size of a modelled effect; the observed figure is how the metric's level moved. They are different quantities, and nothing here measures the decision's own financial effect.
Hypothesis holds (inferred)
An inferred association over a window where other factors also changed — never a proven cause.
Decisions are captured from Today cards and modeled scenarios — with the numbers as they stood at decision time. There is no blank form, so every entry stays auditable.