FP&A — Decisions

Financial Analyst Today Performance Forecast Business model Decisions Reports

⋯

Data & settings

Example: Hospitality

Change example

Which choices need action, which are underway, and did the last ones land.

✦ Ask the analyst

Available on every tab in your workspace — answers come with sources, the period, the calculation, and a confidence level.

Compare this decision's expected effect with what happened. Which open decisions are past their review date?

Answers run on your connected books after signup. The sample keeps every number deterministic — it never improvises a reply.

Decisions

Where the team answers the questions Today and the scenarios raise — and later checks how each call landed.

Open Today

Needs your decision0

In progress1

Outcome recorded1

Needs your decision

The review window has arrived — check what the metric actually did and settle the call.

Nothing is waiting on you. New questions appear on Today. Open Today →

In progress · review scheduled

Captured and owned; the outcome is re-checked automatically on later closes.

In review Decided 2026-05-20 · Explained

Prime cost rose to 62% of sales from 60% — the spring protein contract reset higher and a labour-hours overrun on the two patio openings added ~$19K. On a hospitality margin that 2-point move is most of a slow shoulder-month's profit.

Assigned for review · Owner: You · Review by: 2026-06-05

Next: nothing to do yet — the outcome is checked automatically after the review date.

Financial effect at decision time

$19,000 – $228,000

Assumptions on the day

· impact shown as a range — the behavioural response to this change is not yet observed, so the high edge annualises a persistent step-change

· 2 source citation(s) back the period figures

View metric lineage →

What happened

Reported as an association over the review window — other factors also changed, never proof of cause.

Outcome recorded Decided 2026-04-19 · Observed

Approved: tighten the dinner prep par levels and re-grid the weekend labor to bring prime cost back under the 62% target.

Modelled a scenario · Owner: Marisol FOH/BOH leads · Review by: 2026-06-13

Financial effect at decision time

$65

Assumptions on the day

· Weekend covers were predictable enough to re-grid labor against.

· Tighter par levels would not raise 86'd-item incidence on peak nights.

Since this decision · Inferred

At decision65

At review62

Movement-3

Hypothesis holds (inferred)

An inferred association over a window where other factors also changed — never a proven cause.

View metric lineage →

Decisions are captured from Today cards and modeled scenarios — with the numbers as they stood at decision time. There is no blank form, so every entry stays auditable.