Which choices need action, which are underway, and did the last ones land.
✦ Ask the analyst
Available on every tab in your workspace — answers come with sources, the period, the calculation, and a confidence level.
Answers run on your connected books after signup. The sample keeps every number deterministic — it never improvises a reply.
DECISIONS AND FOLLOW-UP
What was decided, who owns it and when to review
A short working log: the decision, its owner, the due date, the expected effect and the actual outcome. No automatic scoring and no invented “percent complete”.
Why there is no “approved impact” and no “% on track”
No “approved impact” and no “% on track” here: this ledger has no approval step, and the only outcome it records is a non-causal association. Both figures would have to be invented.
-
State Outcome recorded Decision Approved: hold the next Reigate assembly run to make-to-order and draw down the early finished-goods build before restocking. Owner Priya Anand (Ops) Decided · review by 2026-04-17 2026-06-12 Effect when decided $84 Outcome -5 At review: 79
Assumptions on the day· The June ship date had enough buffer to absorb a make-to-order run.
· Raw + WIP inventory were already at plan — only finished goods had built.
Since this decision · InferredExpected effect (as modelled)$84At decision84At review79Movement-5No on-track score is derived from these. The expected figure is the size of a modelled effect; the observed figure is how the metric's level moved. They are different quantities, and nothing here measures the decision's own financial effect.
Hypothesis holds (inferred)
An inferred association over a window where other factors also changed — never a proven cause.
Showing 1 of 2 · Decisions are captured from Today cards and modeled scenarios — with the numbers as they stood at decision time. There is no blank form, so every entry stays auditable.